home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1223 / 1223p021.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  85KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | tree
OCR: 11 such an invasion. Pet. App. 19a-20a The court, did not elaborate on the significance those differences. Second, the court appeals stated that, unlike the requests in Reporters Committee. the unions disclo- sure requests do not arisc under FOIA but originate from the Labor Statute and iits Congressionally en- dorsed framework for protecting and promoting col- lective bargaining Pet. App. 20a. The court con cluded that "Reporters' Committee limited ts the situation that arises when disclosure sought under the FOLA alone 23a Once the interest promoting collective barga ining considered. the court held, "disclosure of the employees names and addresses would not. constitute clcarly unwarranted invasion of privacy, and is not prohibited by the Pri- vacy Act at 26a. Thus, the court enforced th ...